A- de 2011
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Mauricio González Cuervo
✓Claimant Samir Alberto Bonnet Ortiz·Respondent Sin Información
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Competencia constitucional y legal
- Sólo podrá ser alegada antes de proferido el fallo y por violación al debido proceso
- No constituye oportunidad para reabrir debates jurídicos resueltos
- Reiteración de jurisprudencia
- Requisitos formales y materiales de procedencia
- Denegar por hacer referencia a situaciones particulares en sentencia C-916/10
- Improcedencia de recursos
- Gozan de estabilidad superlativa
- Naturaleza excepcional
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Solicitud de Nulidad de la Sentencia C-916/10.
El solicitante manifestó la inconformidad del fallo pero no demostró la violación al debido proceso con base en argumentos serios y coherentes; requisito necesario para que prospere una solicitud de nulidad, ya que el simple inconformismo del solicitante no es suficiente para declararla.
DENEGADA.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- RESUELVE
- DENEGAR la solicitud de nulidad de la sentencia C-916 de 2010, presentada por el ciudadano Samir Alberto Bonnet Ortiz.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.